What, another WordPress site?

I’m a big fan of Blacknight for hosting and domains (not so much for mail in the last while, but they’ve making big changes to make it more reliable – it’s also free with the shared hosting packages). I’m also a big fan of the TWiT network and TWiG (This Week in Google) in particular. So, having held off for a while on starting to use Gina Trapani‘s rather brilliant looking ThinkUp App (which lets you aggregate your social activity in a database that you control) I was pleased to see it hit version 1.0 on Thursday.  Having head about it on three shows, I took the plunge (actually, I tried to install it on my Mac first, but gave up after realising that would be difficult and silly). I’ve used my Minimus hosting package to host the application on Blacknight, which is a damn cheap way to do it. So, here’s the actual process in short form. If you need more help with more specific steps, just give me a shout (I really wish I’d recorded the install process now). It takes only the tiniest bit of know-how, so you should be fine really.

The steps are:

  • Create a new domain/ subdomain
  • Set up FTP and a database
  • Transfer the files
  • Set up the ThinkUp app

Before you begin, a disclaimer: I am not liable for anything breaking in this process. I did this twice using Blacknight and it worked fine both times. Back up the data on your web servers before you do this – don’t regret it later if something goes wrong. Please, if you see a mistake let me know in the comments below.

With a Blacknight hosting package, log in to the control panel.

  1. You need to use a web space, so either use a new domain or a subdomain (I went for a subdomain). Let’s pretend you’re creating thinkupapp.janesblog.com – Hit ‘Add New Subdomain’ from the ‘Sites & Domains’ part of ‘Web Hosting’. Enter your subdomain (thinkupapp), then select your domain (janesblog.com). From ‘Hosting’, select ‘Website (Apache)’. When the page does a quick refresh, check that the subscription is correct, then click ‘Next’ (you don’t need mail hosting). Change the radio button to select ‘Create a new webspace’, unless you have a spare webspace, in which case be very, very careful that you don’t over-write what’s already there! Click ‘Next’. Check that you’ve selected the correct subscription and click ‘Next’. On the next page, select ‘Run as an Apache module’ under ‘PHP5 support’ then click ‘Next’, then ‘Next’, then ‘Finish’. Your domain/ subdomain will now wirr away syncing for a little bit, once it’s finished move on to the next step.
  2. On the left-hand side on the ‘Web Hosting’ page, click ‘Web Space’, then click ‘Webspaces in the sub-menu that appears. Find your domain/ subdomain, then click ‘Select’. On the left-hand menu, click ‘FTP Access’. Enter a new FTP login name and either generate a new password, or use an existing one, then click next. Click on ‘FTP Access’ on the left-hand side again and you’ll see the details for your FTP access appear. Note the FTP server and document root, as well as keeping your login name and password.
  3. Look back on the left-hand side of the panel and click ‘Databases’. Click ‘Add New Database’ and make sure ‘MySQL (MySQL5 Database)’ is selected, then click ‘Next’. Type in a database name (leave the ‘External Hosts’ button unticked) then type in a username and password. Note all of this information, including the d******_ and u*******_ parts of the username and database name, then press ‘Next’ then ‘Finish’.
  4. That’s the hard parts done (more or less). Download the latest version of the ThinkUp app and unzip it. Now, open up your favourite FTP client (I use Filezilla). In ‘Host’, use the ‘FTP Server’ you noted earlier and port 21, selecting ‘Normal’ authentication and using the FTP login name and password that you created earlier. Click in to ‘webspace’, then ‘httpdocs’. If you’re using Filezilla, find the directory you extracted the ‘thinkup’ folder in to, then drag it over to the web space, so that the ‘thinkup’ directory is transferred. Go grab a beer, or something, then come back when it’s done.
  5. Now, use your favourite browser to go to your subdomain.TLD/thinkup, e.g.: http://thinkupapp.janesblog.com/thinkup If you’re process went like mien, here you’ll get an error about incorrect folder permissions. There are instructions on that page that describe what to do, but in case you can’t tell, what I did was open up Terminal on my Mac and type FTP (there’s probably a way of doing this via FileZilla, but it hasn’t worked great for me before with changing folder permissions). At the FTP prompt, type open then your FTP server, then type in your FTP username, press return and enter your password. Type ls to list the files and folders in your directory, then type cd webspace and press return, then cd httpdocs and return, then cd thinkup and return, then cd _lib (there’s a space between ‘cd’ and the underscore) and return, then finally cd view. Now, type in chmod 777 compiled_view and press return. This sets permissions for this directory (folder). Now, go back to your browser and refresh the page. This should bring you to a page with a link to install ThinkUp – click that link.
  6. Now, enter a name, username and password for the ThinkUp app and choose your time zone. Enter your ‘Database Host’, which for Blacknight is your database’s ‘Internal hostname’ – probably something.cp.blacknight.com and the database name, username and password that you created earlier. Again, you’ll probably get an error here saying ‘ThinkUp couldn’t write the config.inc.php file.’. So, take the chunk of text in the box and paste it into TextEdit. Save this file as a plan text file on your desktop as ‘config.inc.php’. Open FireZilla again, connect to your FTP access for ThinkUp and click on ‘webspace’, then ‘httpdocs’, then ‘thinkup’. Transfer the file you just created to this directory, then go back to your web browser and press ‘Next Step’. Boom – you’re done! Check for your activation email, click the link in there and sign in. You gave ThinkUp running! That’s the hard work done.

The rest of the process (of setting up the Twitter, Google+ and Facebook APIs) is very well-documented, so I won’t bother going in to that.

So, there we go – the ThinkUp app on Blacknight, in no time at all. Feel free to spread this information around and re-write it, so long as you clearly attribute it to me by name and with a link to this blog post.

You’ll find me on Twitter, Facebook, Google+ and LinkedIn. I’ll be posting more stuff in future, more tech stuff hopefully, like that map of free Wifi hotspots in Dublin from two years ago that really needs to be updated.

Celebrating Death

The notion that images of  a dead guy will be appearing on the front page of newspapers around the world today sickens me. It doesn’t matter who someone is, or what they did, celebrating death is pathetic and sickening. Remember how there were images of celebration after the September the 11th attacks? Remember how sick that made you feel? Well, celebrating the death of one person is just as horrific. How have we not progressed from “horrid, medieval behaviour” (A quote from Sharon)? How are we still joyous when someone is killed, regardless of who they are?

 

Fuck, I worry sometimes.

I was in a dead-tree bookstore today and noticed two things: First, practically all of the shelves were labelled “Bargain”, which immediately turned me off the contents of pretty much 90% of the shop. “Bargain” to me doesn’t scream “Good value”, it screams “Out-of-date content”. I got the feeling, looking at the books, that a lot of the information that they contained would be irrelevant. I saw an iPhone development book for dummies in there, which I presume (given that iOS5 and iPhone 4S are only just out) is at least one generation behind the times. I was hoping to pick up a few books for work (mostly about SharePoint Online 2010), but looking at the shelves I just thought “I’m not gonna find anything relevant or useful at all”.

The other thing I noticed happened when I was reading a recommendation for ‘Freakonomics‘, by Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner. I happen to really like that book and agreed with the recommendation. I wanted a ‘Like’ button, or a ‘+1′ button, so that I could agree with it! Ah, alas the meatspace is not as interactive as digital space. (Here’s a free recommendation: go and enjoy the Freakonomics podcast, it’s really good and one of my favourites).

Anyway, in the end we had a €5 off voucher for purchases over €25, so we got a few things and I got ‘What Would Google Do‘ by Jeff Jarvis. I’ve started his newer book, ‘Public Parts‘ and, while I don’t really agree with everything he has to say, it’s good so far.

A friend of mine, Gavin Carton, has produced a short documentary about the gay marriage/ civil partnership debate. It includes interviews with Brian Finnegan (editor of Gay Community News), Senator David Norris (2011 Irish presidential candidate), Max Krzyzanowski (LGBT Noise spokesperson) and two delightful and wonderful women: Bernadette Manning and Ann Pendergrast. Oh, those two! I know them. They’re my mums. Here’s the documentary, in two parts, embedded below:

 

As many people will have noticed, in spite of the media hype surrounding FamilyRadio.com’s prediction of Judgement Day, no such thing seems to have happened. It’s just another day with a total lack of surprise about nothing happening. There were jokes aplenty on Twitter and Facebook and some great examples of people jumping on the post-rapture clothes pile meme (Check out this one for example). Chatting about it in the pub on Saturday night, a few different ideas came up. The first was that the idea of the Rapture or Judgement Day isn’t actually much more different or less, well, stupid than the vast majority of the central tenants of other religions. The idea of a virgin birth, eating the literal flesh of Christ in Communion, the creation of the universe 6,000 or 10,000 years ago, a great flood and that bloke Noah with the boat that picked up two of every animal (after killing one of every “clean” animal in a sacrifice, planting a vineyard and getting drunk and naked. Oh and Noah was 500 years old), or the story of Adam and Eve, or a plague of frogs, or God making all of life, or bringing people back to life, or the insane misogyny of it all, are all bizarre ideas and yet people thing they are literally true. I met the FamilyRadio.com folks back in January in Edinburgh (read more here) and, to be honest their arguments were based on the presumption of the absolute truth of the Bible, which is clearly bonkers – check out this page on the Skeptics Annotated Bible for 456 examples of contradictions in the Bible.

I’ll put it this way: If you believe in a religion and you do so because of faith in the Bible, what’s the difference between you and the Family Radio people? Camping extrapolated from the Bible and did some funky calculations, then decided he was right (He also did the same in 1994). Taking holy books out of context, ignoring the contradictions and only obeying and enforcing the rules you like are all mainstays of religions. If you prefer to hear about Islam or the Mormons check out the Skeptics Annotated Quran or Book of Mormon.

In addition to this, Christianity subscribes to the notion of Judgement Day and the end of the world. The difference is that, well, we don’t know when it will happen. This is rather convenient, as it means that if it does happen at any point in the future, a Christian can say “Look, I told you so”.

What I don’t understand is why people who don’t believe in the virgin birth, or the flood, or women being inferior to men, or gays being abominations, or the Communion being the literal flesh of Jesus, or any other daft idea still call themselves Christians. What’s the point? The community? Emotional blackmail from your family? Being a Christian necessitates an acceptance and an endorsement of Christianity and the mad stuff it brings with it.

Also, if you think that religion is a topic that shouldn’t be critically discussed then, well, you’re wrong. Everything needs critical discussion.


I retweeted that because it’s funny. You don’t have the right to not be offended. Sacred cows need the most mocking.less than a minute ago via TweetList Pro Favorite Retweet Reply

Hello all. Thanks for dropping by and welcome to the new website. I’ve redirected my old WordPress.com to here and will be blogging here from now on. Update your RSS feeds! I’ll try and actually get content up here more regularly from now on…

Well, that grew legs. It grew legs, then ran away around the place for a long while. Then it decided to keep going for longer. Even a day later I’m still getting lots of hits. So, well, thanks everyone for sharing that post. It was by far my most popular blog post to date, racking up nearly 1500 views on the blog yesterday and over 400 today. Here’s the stats, click to bigify:

Conor Pendergrast - Blog Stats

 

Average beforehand was about 10 – 20 views a day. I really must post more and I will, now that I’m coming to the end of my masters.

If you’ve read Richard’s response, then let me know what you think in the comments below. Thanks to everyone who left nice words on the last blog post and people who followed the RSS feed etc.

I’ll try to entertain all you kind folk again in the future. As always, if there’s some newfangled or re-hashed arguments against gay marriage or gays and lesbians having kids, do let me know. Twitter is a good place to find me.

Conor

Dear Richard

Hello everyone, it’s been a while. I’m responding to this.

Dear Richard,

There are a few points in your piece that I’d like to respond to. I’ll try to be brief (no guarantee though). You say:

Explaining that you oppose gay marriage as a gay man tends to get a baffled response at first.

I think, had you phrased that a little differently, it would be less baffling. Had you said “I don’t want to get married”, I doubt you would get such a reaction. Opposition to gay marriage, on the other hand, is different. Opposing marriage rights for lesbian and gay people, as a gay man, is an expression of your desire to deny yourself a right. If you don’t want to get married, then don’t get married.

I have no problem with dissent. It’s vital. Lucinda Creighton was (is still, I think?) Deputy spokesperson on Justice with special responsibilities for Immigration, Integration and Equality. That’s why there was such a reaction, because her poorly-constructed argument (the one you appear to support in your article, but do correct me if I’m wrong about that) was that gay men and lesbian women shouldn’t be allowed marriage rights because they don’t have children. Well, they do have children and they should be permitted to marry. She’s also a public representative. David Quinn? He’s not a public representative. I don’t really care what he says. I follow him on Twitter, just out of morbid curiousity.

Actually, gay people should defend the traditional understanding of marriage as strongly as everyone else.

Which part of the “traditional understanding of marriage” should be defended exactly? The ban on divorce? The ownership of women as property and no longer being seen as separate legal person? Marriages motivated by property transactions and dowries instead of love?

I think you’re falling into the trap of the romantic idea of marriage. I realise that you are conservative, but that doesn’t mean you have to always think that tradition is best – that’s just a silly stereotype. Lesbian women and gay men will not lead to the degradation of marriage. It will not lead to the decline of society. It will not kill the dinosaurs. It will lead to (and prepare yourself for a shock) lesbian women and gay men getting married. The definition of marriage is and has been constantly evolving, and too right. It’s just a legal term that needs to represent the culture and society of the time.

If, however, I or gay friends form civil partnerships, those are much more unlikely to involve raising children.

Gay men and lesbian women have been having children in London since the early 1980s and probably before that. Ireland is a smaller country, where homosexuality was still illegal in our lifetime, Richard. The smaller population means that there are fewer gay men and lesbian women, even in Dublin. Societal norms haven’t yet caught up with the needs that lesbians and gays feel to have a family.

They do have families and want families. My mums met in London in the early ‘ 80s. They fell in love and wanted a family. So they had one. Using a sperm donor they had me, then using a different donor they had my brother.

My family needs marriage. My friends who have lesbian and gay parents need marriage. Without it, our rights are not protected and the rights and responsibilities of my parents are not enshrined in law. I’ll explain that: Surely those of you out there who want to protect children and families should realise that we are children and families! We are being put in vulnerable situations by the lack of legislation on the matter and, by extension, those who oppose marriage rights for lesbian and gay people.

A wealth of research demonstrates the marriage of a man and a woman provides children with the best life outcomes, that children raised in marriages that stay together do best across a whole range of measures. This is certainly not to cast aspersions on other families, but it does underscore the importance of marriage as an institution.

Prove it. Really, do. At least name-check one institution or research report. Off the top of my head, I’ll counter your argument with the American Psychological Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics. Neither of them are lobby groups for gays or lesbians, but they still support gays and lesbians being parents, as they have seen (through a wealth of research) that they raise children just as well as straight parents. Here’s a technical report that I found within 5 seconds of searching on the AAP’s website from way back when in 2002, which even then realised that the evidence was on the side of lesbians and gays being good parents. Really, why would it be any other way? As a straight man, I’m not arrogant enough to say that I will, by default, be a better father than you, Richard, simply because of your sexuality. That’s a ridiculous notion.

If gay couples are considered equally eligible for marriage, even though gay relationships do not tend towards child-raising and cannot by definition give a child a mother and a father, the crucial understanding of what marriage is actually mainly for has been discarded.

Marriage is not mainly for child-rearing. It’s for expressing love and making concrete vows to your partner. It’s about committing yourself to one person. Child-raising is not exclusive to marriage and marriage is not exclusive to child-raising. I would prefer if people made a long-term commitment before they had children, because that would protect the children, but I can’t and won’t force people to do something.

I know, I know. I’m a liberal, you’re a conservative. Maybe you won’t see what I mean. Maybe you won’t realise that your opposition to marriage rights for lesbian women and gay men leads to discrimination on a social and institutional level against the two people who I hold dearest in the world – my mums. Usually, Mothers’ Day is less fun for me as I have twice as many presents to buy. This Mothers’ Day though, I had two mums to get loving text messages from. Is that so wrong?

I don’t care if you don’t want to get married Richard. I really don’t. What is wrong is that you want to stop my mums from getting married. You want to stop my friends who are gay and lesbian from getting married. You want to stop the men and women who have provided such incredible role models to me throughout my life getting married. That makes me sad.

All the best,

Conor Pendergrast

Proud son of two loving mums.

Ps: Comment below, because that’s the point of having a blog.

If you don’t know what #picamp is, then take a look at this. It was an unconference about how to improve politics, organised by Slugger O’Toole. We had our own session about reasoning and critical thinking in politics for Belfast Skeptics, you can read about that here. The whole day was really good overall, but I had some reservations about the session after lunch, which was a panel-based discussion apparently about why old-media journalism p0wns blogging and is full of win. Or something. Anyway, I didn’t taken many notes so I can’t remember completely the content of the talk, but it was frustrating.

The plenary felt like a bitching session about blogs and blogging, which was really bloody pointless. Ideas like “bloggers can’t be held accountable” and “bloggers don’t check their facts” and the notion that news media will survive without changing its ways are all seriously short-sighted and foolish. As one participant (possibly Will Perrin) pointed out, the panelists were all tarring all bloggers with the same brush, while suggesting that the integrity of journalists were second-to-none. After this was suggested, the debate was altered somewhat to take this into account, but it’s a key point: there are very few investigative journalists left in the mainstream media (MSM). Similarly, the overwhelming majority of blogs are not worth printing.Old newspaper

But there are some real gems there. Maman Poulet and The Story are two examples of that. It was claimed that bloggers don’t hang on to stories and continue pecking away at them, but that’s utter crap. You can easily say the same about MSM; the vast majority will run stories that are relevant to the moment and then move on. This was addresses in the discussion; it’s a huge financial commitment for a newspaper to release a journalist to spend a few days or weeks working on a story that might lead to nothing. Bloggers, on the other hand, tend to earn a grand total of zero cent from their blogs. Most of them are just works of passion and a desire to stop being fooled by bullshit. Look at Tuppenceworth and their probing in to Your Country Your Call. If you think that the MSM is going to survive in the future, you ought to have a better plan than just holding tight and slagging off blogs.

There shouldn’t be a “them versus us” debate there. There is no debate, the Internet and blogs are going to exists. They’re going to get news out faster than MSM can ever do and they’ll do a far better job at “niche” news than any non-speciality journalist will. Bloggers are competing with MSM and MSM shouldn’t feel the need to compete with bloggers. When I read a blog, I want opinion. When I read a newspaper, I don’t want opinion. I want fact. One problem is that newspapers are so swamped with opinion pieces, celebrity scandal and partisan news reporting that I don’t bother reading any of that crap. I also think that newspapers are a huge waste of paper. They’ve a shelf-life of, what, 12 hours at most? If I get a tablet device, I’ll probably read more papers, ’cause that way I can digest the stories easier.

So, there we go. The discussion annoyed me. I can see where the panellists where coming from; their industry is changing rapidly and in a way that is totally out of their control. Fear is gripping newsrooms around the world. Lashing out at the “bloggosphere” won’t help that.

Comment below to give your opinion.

~ Conor

I was at the Political Innovation unconference organised by Slugger O’Toole on Saturday and attended a few sessions. There’ll be a post on the Belfast Skeptics website about our own session on critical thinking, but I took a few notes on the hyperlocal session. It was hosted by Will Perrin of the Kings Cross Local Environment site in London. What he suggested was to just throw something on the Internet and get writing! Write about local things that are happening, then if there are problems just send the information on to local councillors for help. Will has said that once the local politicians realise that the intent of the website is positive overall, they are eager to get involved. He has said that anyone can be involved in generating content, including politicians and that this is mediated by the golden rule: no party politics on the site. With that in mind, people are very cooperative. Examples of hyperlocal sites include:

For resources in setting up hyperlocal sites, check out Talk About Local, which appears to have a huge amount of resources for starting up hyperlocal sites. In addition to this, OpenlyLocal.com has a ton of information and a map of loads of hyperlocal sites as well as information on local government. Anyway, if you want to add more, do so in the comments below.

 

Thanks for dropping by.